Сетевой подход к организационному дизайну 
Грандори А., Сода Д.

Применение анализа социальных сетей для организационного дизайна;
Дизайн на базе структурно-ситуационного сетевого анализа;
Кейс 1. Конструирование структуры производственной координации;
Анализ операций;
Анализ ресурсов;
Сравнение выводов анализа ресурсов
и операций;
Рисуем эскиз организационной структуры;
Реляционный и комбинаторный сетевой дизайн;
Кейс 2. Проектирование структуры управления инвестициями в человеческий капитал;

Ключевые слова: анализ социальных сетей, организационный дизайн, комплементарность


В статье описан синтез двух ранее независимых подходов: организационного дизайна и анализа социальных сетей. Преимущества практического применения нового стратегического инструмента продемонстрированы на реальных бизнес-кейсах.

Журнал: «Стратегический менеджмент» — №4, 2009 (© Издательский дом Гребенников)
Объем в страницах: 19
Кол-во знаков: около 42,718
* Деятельность Meta (соцсети Facebook и Instagram) запрещена в России как экстремистская.

1. Adler P.S., Kwon S. (2002). «Social сэрКак prospects for a new concept». Academy of Management Review, Vol. 27(1), pp. 17-40.

2. Ahuja G. (2000). «Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study». Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 45, pp. 425-455.

3. Ahuja G. (2000). «The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages». Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 317-343.

4. Barzel Y. (1989). Economic Analysis of Property Rights. Cambridge University Press.

5. Bavelas A. (1951). «Communication patterns in task-oriented groups». In: Lerner D., Lasswell H.K. (Eds). The Policy Sciences. Standord University Press.

6. Burns T., Stalker G.M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. Tavistock Publications, London.

7. Burt R.S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press.

8. Burt R.S. (2001). «Structural holes versus closure as social capital». In: Lin N., Cook K.S., Burt R.S. (Eds). Social Capital: Theory and Research. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.

9. Burt R.S. (2004). «Structural holes and good ideas». American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 110(2), pp. 394-399.

10. Campbell D.T. (1969). «Reforms as experiments». American Psychologist, Vol. 24, pp. 409-429.

11. Child J. (2002). «A aonfigurational analysis of international joint ventures». Organization Studies, Vol. 23, pp. 781-815.

12. Coleman J.S. (1988). «Social capital in the creation of human capital». American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94 (Supplement), pp. 95-120.

13. Combs J.G., Ketchen D. (1999). «Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: toward a reconciliation of predictions form the resource-based view and organizational economics». Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, pp. 867-888.

14. Cross R., Parker A. (2004). The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations. Harvard Business School Publishing, Cambridge, MA.

15. Cyert R.M., March J.J. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

16. Fontana W. (2003). The Topology of the Possible. Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM.

17. Grabher G. (1993). «The weakness of strong ties: the lock-in of regional development in the Ruhr area». In: Grabher G. (Ed.). The Embedded Firm. Routledge, London.

18. Grandori A. (1997). «Governance structures, coordination mechanisms and cognitive models». Journal of Management and Governance, Vol. 1(1), pp. 29-47.

19. Grandori A. (2001). Organization and Economic Behavior. Routledge, London.

20. Grandori A. (2001). «Neither hierarchy nor identity: knowledge governance mechanisms and the theory of the firm». Journal of Management and Governance,Vol. 5(3-4), pp. 381-399.

21. Grandori A. (2004). «The changing core of organization and organizations: from contingency to combinative». RivistadiPoliticaEconomica, Special International Issue «Organizations redays

22. Grandori A., Soda G. (1998). A Relational Approach to Organization Design. EGOS Colloquium, July, Maastricht, NL.

23. Grandori A., Soda G. (2004). «Governing with multiple principals: an empirically based analysis of capital providers preferences and superior governance structures». In: Grandori A. (Ed.). Corporate Governance and Firm Organization. Oxford University Press.

24. Grandori A. et al. (2004). AOM, Generative Design of Organization. Symposium.

25. Granovetter M. (1973). «The strength of weak ties». American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, pp. 1360-1380.

26. Ichniowski C., Shaw C., Prennushi G. (1997). «The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: а study of steel finishing lines». American Economic Review, Vol. 87(3), pp. 291-313.

27. Ilinitch A.Y., D'Aveni R., Lewin A.Y. (1995). «New organizational forms and strategies for managing in hypercompetitive environments». Organization Science, Vol. 7(3), pp. 211-220.

28. Krackhardt D., Carley K. (1998). A PCANS Model of Structure in Organizations. Proceedings of the 1998 International Symposium on Command and Control Research and Technology. June, Monterey, CA.

29. Laursen K., Mahnke V. (2001). «Knowledge strategies, firm types and complementarity in human resource practices». Journal of Management and Governance, Vol. 5(1), pp. 1-22.

30. Lawrence P., Dyer D. (1983). Renewing American Industry. Free Press, New York.

31. Lawrence P., Lorsch J. (1967). Organization and Environment. Harvard Business School Press.

32. Lesage C., Cottrell M. (Eds). (2003). Connectionist Approaches in Economics and Management Sciences. Series: Advances in Computational Management Science, Vol. 6. Kluwer Academic Publisher.

33. Letremy P., Cottrell M. (2003). «Working times in atypical forms of employement: the special case of part-time work». In: Lesage C., Cottrell M. (Eds). Connectionist Approaches in Economic and Management Sciences. Kluwer Academic Publisher.

34. Maier N.R.F. (1967). «Assets and liabilities in group problem solving». Psychological Review, Vol. 74(4), pp. 239-249.

35. Milgrom P., Roberts J. (1995). «Complementarities and fit: strategy, structure and organizational change in manufacturings Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 19(2), pp. 179-208.

36. Miller G.J. (1992). Managerial Dilemmas. The Political Economy of Hierarchy. Cambridge University Press.

37. Ouchi W.G. (1980). «Markets, bureaucracies and clans». Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 25, pp. 129-141.

38. Pearce J.A., David F.R. (1983). «A social network approach to organizational design-performance». Academy of Management Review, Vol. 8(3), pp. 436-444.

39. Pettigrew A., Massini S., Tsuyoshi N. (2000). «Innovative forms of organizing in Europe and Japan». European Management Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 259-273.

40. Reagans R., Zuckerman E.W. (2001). «Networks, diversity, and productivity: the social capital of R&D teams». Organization Science, Vol. 12(4), pp. 502-517.

41. Roberts J. (2004). The Modern Firm. Organizational Design for Performance and Growth. Oxford University Press.

42. Salancik G.R. (1995). «Wanted a good network theory of organizations Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, pp. 345-349.

43. Severin E. (2003). «Mechanisms of discipline and corporate performance: evidence from France». In: Lesage C., Cottrell M. (Eds). Connectionist Approaches in Economic and Management Sciences. Kluwer Academic Publisher.

44. Simon H. (1982). The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

45. Soda G., Usai A. (1998). «The dark side of dense networks: from embeddedness to indebtedness». In: Grandori A. (Ed.). Interfirm Networks: Organization and Industrial Competitiveness. Routledge, London, UK.

46. Soda G., Usai A., Zaheer A. (2004). «Network memory: the influence of past and current networks on performances Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47(6), pp. 893-906.

47. Thompson J.D. (1967). Organization in Action. McGraw-Hill, New York.

48. Trist E. (1981). «The socio-technical perspectives In: Van de Ven A.H., Joyce W.F. (Eds). Perspectives on Organization Design and Behavior. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

49. Uzzi B. (1997). «Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness». Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42, pp. 35-67.

50. Van de Ven A.H., Delbecq A.L., Koenig R. (1976). «Determinants of coordination modes within organizations American Sociology Review, Vol. 41(2), pp. 322-338.

51. Whittington R. et al. (1999). «Change and complementarities in the new competitive landscape: a European panel study, 1992-1996». Organization Science, Vol. 10(5), pp. 583-600.

52. Williamson O.E. (1991). «Economic institutions: spontaneous and intentional governances Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol. 7, pp. 159-187.

Грандори Анна

Профессор факультета менеджмента, университет Боккони (Bocconi University).


Сода Джузеппе

Доцент факультета менеджмента, университет Боккони (Bocconi University).