Социальные связи и убедительность вирусной кампании в социальной сети: роль воспринимаемого рекламного характера сообщения
Ван Норт Г., Антенис М., Ван Реймерсдал Е.

Аннотация

Предлагаем вниманию читателей перевод статьи голландских ученых, в которой исследуется важное предположение: большую роль в том, какое влияние оказывает рекламная кампания, играет социальный контекст. Авторы выясняют, влияет ли социальная связь между отправителем и получателем сообщения вирусной кампании в социальной сети на степень убедительности этой кампании. Также в статье обсуждается, как результаты данного исследования должны отразиться на практических действиях маркетолога в социальных медиа.

Содержание

Социальные сети и социальные связи;
Вирусные кампании в социальных сетях;
Вирусные маркетинговые кампании и сила связи;
Рекламный характер сообщения;
Метод исследования;
Участники и процедура исследования;
Материалы;
Измерения;
Результаты;
Обсуждение;
Теоретические выводы и будущие исследования;
Практическое значение результатов исследования;

Ключевые слова: социальные сети, вирусный маркетинг, сила связей, убедительность
Журнал: «Маркетинговые коммуникации» — №6, 2013 (© Издательский дом Гребенников)
Объем в страницах: 16.
Кол-во знаков: около 40,592.

1. Aboud F.E., Mendelson MJ. (1996). «Determinants of friendship selection and quality: developmental perspectives». In: Bukowski W.M., New-comb A.F., Hartup W.W. (Eds). The Company the Keep: Friendship in Childhood and Adolescence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 87-112.

2. Antheunis M.L., Valkenburg P.M., Peter J. (2010). The Quality of Online, Offline, and Mixedmode Friendships among Users of Social Network Sites. Paper presented at the ICA Conference, June 22-26, Singapore.

3. Bansal H.S., Voyer P.A. (2000). «World-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context». Journal of Service Research, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 166-177.

4. Boyd D.M. (2006). «Friends, Friendsters, and MySpace Top 8: writing community into being on social network sites». First Monday, Vol. 11, No. 12. — Подробнее .

5. Boyd D.M. (2004). Friendster and Publicly Articulated Social Networking. Paper Presented at the Conference of Human Factors and Computing Systems in Vienna, Austria.

6. Boyd D.M., Ellison N.B. (2008). «Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarships Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 210-230.

7. Brown J.J., Broderick A.J., Lee N. (2007). «Word of mouth communication within online communities: conceptualizing the online social networks Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 2-20.

8. Brown J.J., Reingen P.H. (1987). «Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behaviors The Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 350-362.

9. Carrasco J.A., Miller EJ. (2006). «Exploring the propensity to perform social activities: a social network approach». Transportation, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 463-480.

10. Chaiken S. (1980). «Heuristic versus systematic information processing in the use of source versus message cues in persuasions Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 39, pp. 752-766.

11. Chiu H.-C., Hsieh Y.-C., Kao Y.-H. and Lee M. (2007). «The determinants of email receivers' disseminating behaviors on the Internets Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 524-534.

12. Chiu C.-M., Hsu M.-H., Wang E.T.G. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories Decision Support Systems, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 1872-1888.

13. Cordoba E. (2001). «The view from taft: viral marketings Business World, June 21, pp. 1-3.

14. De Bruyn A., Lilien G.L. (2008). «A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence through viral marketings International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 151-163.

15. Dobele A., Lindgreen A., Beverland M., Vanhamme J. and van Wijk R. (2007). «Why pass on viral messages? Because they connect emotional-ly». Business Horizons, Vol. 50, No. 4, pp. 291-304.

16. Dobele A., Toleman D., Beverland M. (2005). «Controlled infection! Spreading the brand message through viral marketings Business Horizons, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 143-149.

17. Duck S.W. (1983). Friends for Life. Harvester, Brighton, UK.

18. Dwyer C., Hiltz S.R., Passerini K. (2007). Trust and Privacy Concern within Social Networking Sites: a Comparison of Facebook and MySpace. Paper Presented at the 13 Americas Conference on Information Systems in Keystone, CO, USA.

19. Ellison N.B., Steinfield C., Lampe C. (2006). Spatially Bounded Online Social Networks and Social Capital: the Role of Facebook. Paper Presented at the 56 Annual Conference of the International Communication Association in Dresden, Germany.

20. Ellison N.B., Steinfield C., Lampe C. (2007). «The benefits of Facebook «friends»: social capital and college students' use of online social network sites». Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 1143-1168.

21. eMarketer (2009). Online Advertising Pushes Through. — Подробнее .

22. eMarketer (2011). Social Network Ad Revenues Rising Worldwide. — Подробнее .

23. eMarketer (2010). The Influence of Mobile on Social Marketing's Future. — Подробнее .

24. eMarketer (2011). Where Are Social Media Marketers Seeing the Most Success? — Подробнее .

25. Fagerstrom A., Ghinea G. (2010). «Web 2.0's marketing impact on low-involvement consumers». Journal of Interactive Advertising, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 67-71.

26. Friestad M., Wright P. (1994). «The persuasion knowledge model: how people cope with persuasion attempts». Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 22, June, pp. 62-74.

27. Gotlieb J.B., Sarel D. (1992). «The influence of type of advertisement, price, and source credibility on perceived quality». Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 253-260.

28. Granovetter M.S. (1982). «The strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited». In: Marsden P.V., Lin N. (Eds). Social Structure and Network Analyses. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 105-130.

29. Greer J.D. (2003). «Evaluating the credibility of online information: a test of source and advertising influences Mass Communication andSociety, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 11-28.

30. Hallinan M.T., Kubitschek W.N. (1998). «The effects of individual and structural characteristics on intransitivity in social networks». Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 51, pp. 81-92.

31. Huang C.-C., Lin T.-C., Lin K.-J. (2009). «Factors affecting pass-along email intentions (PAEIs): integrating the social capital and social cognition theories». Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 160-169.

32. Ho J.Y.C., Dempsey M. (2010). «Viral marketing: motivations to forward online contents Journal of Business Research, Vol. 63, No. 9-10, pp. 1000-1006.

33. Hofstetter R., Shriver S.K., Nair H.S. (2011). Inducing User-Generated Content: Empirical Evidence on the Effect of Social Ties on Content Generation. Paper presented at EMAC, May 24-27 in Ljubljana, Slovenia.

34. Joinson A.N. (2008). «Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and uses of Facebook». Proceeding of the 26 annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 5-10, Florence, Italy, pp. 1027-1036.

35. Kalyanam K., McIntyre S., Masonis J.T. (2007). «In interactive marketing: the case of viral marketing at Plaxo». Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 72-85.

36. Kelly L., Kerr G., Drennan J. (2010). «Avoidance of advertising in social networking sites: the teenage perspectives Journal of Interactive Advertising, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 16-27.

37. Lampe C., Ellison N.B., Steinfield C. (2006). A Face(book): In the Crowd: Social Searching vs. Social Browsing. Paper presented at the 20 anniversary conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, November 4-8 in Banff, Alberta, Canada.

38. Lenhart A., Purcell K., Smith A. and Zickuhr K. (2010). Social Media and Young Adults. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American life project.

39. Lin T.M.Y., Wu H.-H., Liao C.-W. and Liu T.-H. (2006). «Why are some e-mails forwarded and others not?» Internet Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 81-93.

40. MacKenzie S.B., Lutz R.J., Belch G.E. (1986). «The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: a test of competing explanations». Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 23, pp. 130-143.

41. Mangold W.G., Faulds D.J. (2009). «Social media: the new hybrid element of the promotion mix». Business Horizons, Vol. 52, pp. 357-365.

42. Marsden P.V., Campbell K.E. (1984). «Measuring tie strengths Social Forces, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 482-501.

43. Matthes J., Schemer C., Wirth W. (2007). «More than meets the eye: investigating the hidden impact of brand placements in television maga-zines». International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 26, pp. 477-503.

44. Mesch G.S., Talmud I. (2007). «Similarity and the quality of online and offline social relationships among adolescents in Israels Journal of Research on Adolescents, Vol. 17, pp. 455-466.

45. Norman A.T., Russell C.A. (2006). «The pass-along effect: investigating word-of-mouth effects on online survey procedures». Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 1085-1103.

46. Petty R.E., Priester J.R. (1994). «Mass media attitude change: implications of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasions In: Bryant J., Zill-mann D. (eds). Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 91-122.

47. Phelps J.E., Lewis R., Mobilio L., Perry D. and Raman N. (2004). «Viral marketing or electronic word-of-mouth advertising: examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along emails Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 333-348.

48. Pornpitakpan C. (2004). «The persuasiveness of source credibility: a critical review of five decades' evidences Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 243-281.

49. Preacher K.J., Hayes A.F. (2004). «SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation modelss Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 717-731.

50. Reagans R. (2005). «Preferences, identity, and competition: predicting tie strength from demographic data». Management Science, Vol. 51, pp. 1374-1383.

51. Rogers E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.

52. Rozendaal E., Buijzen M., Valkenburg P.M. (2010). «Comparing children's and adults' cognitive advertising competences in the Netherlands». Journal of Children and Media, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 77-89.

53. Rusbult C.E., Martz J.M., Agnew C.R. (1998). «The investment model scale: measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment sizes Personal Relationships, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 357-391.

54. Smith T., Coyle J.R., Lightfoot E. and Scott A. (2007). «Reconsidering models of influence: the relationship between consumer social networks and word-of-mouth effectiveness». Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 387-397.

55. Steinfield C., Ellison N.B., Lampe C. (2008). «Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: a longitudinal analysis». Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, Vol. 29, pp. 434-445.

56. Subramani M.R., Rajagopalan B. (2003). «Knowledge-sharing and influence in online social networks via viral marketings Communications of the ACM, Vol. 46, No. 12, pp. 300-307.

57. Utz S. (2009). «The (potential) benefits of campaigning via social network sites». Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 14, pp. 221-243.

58. Van Reijmersdal E.A., Neijens P.C., Smit E.G. (2010). «Customer magazines: effects of commerciality on readers' reactions». Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 59-67.

59. Verhoef P., Bijmolt T.H.A., Risselada H. (2011). Dynamic Effects of Social Influence and Marketing on New Product Adoption. Paper presented at EMAC, May 24-27 in Ljubljana, Slovenia.

60. Weinberg T. (2009). The New Community Rules: Marketing on the Social Web. Sebastopol: O'Reilly.

61. Wilson E.R., Sherrell D.L. (1993). «Source effects in communication and persuasion research: a meta-analysis of effect size». Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 101-112.

62. Woerndl M., Papagiannidis S., Bourlakis M. and Li F. (2008). «Internet-induced marketing techniques: critical factors in viral marketing cam-paigns». International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 33-45.

63. Zeng F., Huang L., Dou W. (2009). «Social factors in user perceptions and responses to advertising in online social networking communities». Journal of Interactive Advertising, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1-13.

Ван Норт Гуда

Преподаватель Амстердамской школы коммуникационных исследований (ASCoR) Амстердамского университета.

Амстердам, Нидерланды

Область научных интересов — маркетинговые коммуникации .

Антенис Мариолейн

Преподаватель Тилбургского центра познания и коммуникаций (TiCC) Тилбургского университета.

Тилбург, Нидерланды

Область научных интересов — социальные аспекты новых медиа.

Ван Реймерсдал Ева

Исследователь и преподаватель Амстердамской школы коммуникационных исследований (ASCoR) Амстердамского университета.

Амстердам, Нидерланды

Область научных интересов — маркетинговые коммуникации. Изучает влияние активности брендов в различных медиа.