Электронная библиотека
В чьих интересах? Перепозиционирование парадокса заинтересованных сторон
Далчер Д.
|
|
||
2 |
1. Происхождение понятия «заинтересованные стороны» | |
3 |
2. Парадокс заинтересованных сторон | |
4 |
3. Отчетность и вовлечение | |
5 |
4. Взаимодействие с заинтересованными сторонами в будущем | |
6 |
Литература |
1. Ansoff I. (1965). Strategic Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
2. Bourne L. (2015). Making Projects Work: Effective Stakeholder and Communication Management. Boca Raton: CRC press.
3. Bourne L. (2009). Stakeholder Relationship Management: a Maturity Model for Organisational Implementation. Farnham: Gower.
4. Calton J.M., Payne S.L. (2003). «Coping with paradox: multistakeholder learning dialogue as a pluralist sensemaking process for addressing messy problems». Business & Society, Vol. 42(1), pp. 7–42.
5. Dalcher D. (2015). For Whose Benefit? Reclaiming the Role of Users in Projects. — Подробнее .
6. Dalcher D. (2015). Here Comes Everybody: Reframing the Stakeholder Concept When Just About Everyone Can Become Your Stakeholder. — Подробнее .
7. Dalcher D. (2014). Rethinking Success in Software Projects: Looking Beyond the Failure Factors. In Software Project Management in a Changing World. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
8. Dalcher D. (2014). Too Little, Too Late, or, Too Much, Too Early: Are We Paying Enough Attention to Stakeholders? — Подробнее .
9. Eskerod P., Huemann M., Savage G. (2015). «Project stakeholder management — past and present». Project Management Journal, Vol. 46(6), pp. 6–14.
10. Freeman R.E. (2010). Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Freeman R.E. (1994). «The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions». Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 4(4), pp. 409–421.
12. Freeman R.E., Parmar B.L., Martin K. (2020). The Power of And: Responsible Business Without Trade-Offs. New York: Columbia University Press.
13. Goodpaster K.E. (1991). «Business ethics and stakeholder analysis». Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 1(1), pp. 53–73.
14. Goodpaster K.E., Holloran T.E. (1994). «In defense of a paradox». Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 4(4), pp. 423–429.
15. Goodman M.B., Johansen T.S., Nielsen A.E. (2011). «Strategic stakeholder dialogues: a discursive perspective on relationship building». Corpo-rate Communications: an International Journal, Vol. 16(3), pp. 204–217.
16. Goodpaster K.E., Maines T.D., Rovang M.D. (2002). «Stakeholder thinking: beyond paradox to practicality». Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Vol. (7), pp. 93–111.
17. Jensen K.K. (2007). «Corporate responsibility: the stakeholder paradox reconsidered». Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, Vol. 20(6), pp. 515–532.
18. Kurland N., Calton J. (1996). «A theory of stakeholder enabling: giving voice to an emerging postmodern praxis of organizational discourse». In: Boje D., Gephart R.-Jr., Joseph T. (Eds.). Postmodern Management and Organizational Theory. New York: Sage.
19. Murray-Webster R., Dalcher D. (Eds.) (2019). APM Body of Knowledge. Princes Risborough: Association of Project Management.
20. Nalewaik A. (2019). Project Cost Recording and Reporting. Abingdon: Routledge.
Далчер Даррен Ph.D.
Преподаватель стратегического управления проектами Школы менеджмента Ланкастерского университета. г. Ланкастер, Великобритания
